PLEASE HIT THE "FOLLOW" BUTTON TO THE RIGHT.

                                 ------------

When money is abolished, surveillance becomes inevitable

BY RHODA WILSON ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2025 

The abolition of money, as originally proposed by Karl Marx, would inevitably lead to surveillance because every input and output must be tracked.

Marx’s ideology, when implemented, would result in a system of control and rationing of energy – which is the goal of technocracy.

Marx and Money

By Esc

The moment Karl Marx abolishes money, surveillance becomes inevitable because every input and output must be tracked manually – and that’s a blueprint of liberation? Hah, it’s the blueprint for a panopticon.

Marx built the blueprint for surveillance by eliminating money, while Lenin operationalised it, openly demanding accounting and control as the essence of socialism, while simultaneously calling for a vanguard police state to uphold it.

Hah, such liberty and freedom.

It’s even particularly retarded because the elimination of money itself. This essentially leads to a situation where the person cannot possibly be left with a free choice in terms of spending their own money.

If you opt to argue that what the person receives to spend as he sees fit is vouchers in “units of social labour time,” then – congratulations – you’ve arrived back with a currency.

I’m now more convinced than ever that Marx and Engels were frauds.

We can then further add the producer-consumer analysis in ‘Das Kapital’, an early-stage input-output analysis, which fundamentally assumes perfect knowledge – but to have perfect knowledge, we’re back to full-spectrum surveillance.

None of this retarded religion makes any logical sense. Well … unless you’re a central bank that is. MORE

------------

BOOKS FOR THESE END TIMES 

HERE

------------